Lostcause
Supernatural Fight Club
Don't be economic girlie men!
Posts: 1,273
|
Post by Lostcause on Feb 12, 2012 23:15:44 GMT -5
Yep, that title is perfect. As for sticky, it's a mod thing and erh - yeah I let the brainy mods do that or I might erase the whole SPN board  So if you make it, one of us will sticky it  |
|
Aeryn
Supernatural Fight Club
Posts: 6,545 
|
Post by Aeryn on Feb 12, 2012 23:15:31 GMT -5
Cats aren't dumb you know.  |
|
|
|
Post by eiger57 on Feb 12, 2012 23:20:05 GMT -5
Who of the members have been banned? To my knowledge nobody. We've had to do 1 IP ban, after someone registered several accounts and clearly only wanted to make some trolling. That wasn't any active actual member. We give a lot of freedom to post whatever you wish. You can disagree to your hearts desire. In fact I would love it if you could show one instance where a mod has said or done anything against a post simply because it disagrees - not counting threads that specifically state they aren't made to be debate threads, such as the skeptics thread. We do not go for only 1 type of fans or 1 "team" of fans. In fact we don't even use those terms. We have enough to do scanning everything we can for violations, because most of you gals are intelligent and know just how to keep it allowed. Thanks for the grey hairs!  It's not like we're artificially bumping any thread in here - except me bumping my birthday thread. Which reminds me it's in due time soon... The only thing that keeps certain threads topped is because people feel the need to respond. Nothing is stopping you from making your own new topics about how Cas is better off at the bottom of the lake or in a loonybin or something entirely non Cas related! Make a post about crocs running wild in the Sydney Opera house! I assure you I have pages of stuff to say about that! The only interpretation we do, is when it comes to personal insulting, or if the arguments had suddenly revolves around the members and not the topic. In which case we ask to take it back on track before doing any form of modding. Like I state in the above post, having more freedom to post, also means you have more responsibility to keep the mudslinging off the boards. By the way I'm sorry to say I am not sure what you mean with insighting, is it infighting you mean? Otherwise the word escapes me. It wouldn't be the first time I learned a new word online! Aeryn certainly makes topics and one could come to the conclusion it's to get some form of reaction. You have made a few of your own by the way, this one included and they haven't been taken down either - even though they are targeting a member and not anything at all in regards to SPN or the actors involved. There is a difference between making controversial or emotional posts, and actual hate posts. If you think it started off great and now has gone downhill, that's no good. I would personally hate to see you post less. But we're all tiny little parts in the big Evicted machine. And I vividly encourage you to do your part in getting the boards back the way you liked them then! If it means humor, envolvement and more Bela pictures than one can fathom, you can be sure I'm getting on that bandwagon! As a member of the skeptic thread, I fail to see how a thread titled ( Cas skeptics are going to hell) is not an insult to me personnally. When i joined here and saw there was a skeptics thread I assumed I would be afforded the freedom to not be ridiculed by a fellow poster. Apparently I was wrong. The thread itself is an attack on posters who do not share Aeryn's point of view. You state in your post that you take issue with posters insulting other posters...yet you allow this to continue. |
|
purpledragon1229
Honorary Luthor
"The night is dark and full of terrors..."[C01:660066]
Posts: 1,272
|
Post by purpledragon1229 on Feb 12, 2012 23:24:36 GMT -5
What would it be called: Episode Discussion (spoilers) I don't know how to do the whole sticky, new, thing everyone does. I'm totally computer illiterate when it comes to jazzing it up to look important lol. That'll work. I don't think regular posters can sticky but if you'd like it stickied I can do that for you. |
|
|
|
Post by benson35 on Feb 12, 2012 23:28:33 GMT -5
Well it doesn't have to sticky. I don't mind one way or the other.
|
|
Lostcause
Supernatural Fight Club
Don't be economic girlie men!
Posts: 1,273
|
Post by Lostcause on Feb 12, 2012 23:29:59 GMT -5
Who of the members have been banned? To my knowledge nobody. We've had to do 1 IP ban, after someone registered several accounts and clearly only wanted to make some trolling. That wasn't any active actual member. We give a lot of freedom to post whatever you wish. You can disagree to your hearts desire. In fact I would love it if you could show one instance where a mod has said or done anything against a post simply because it disagrees - not counting threads that specifically state they aren't made to be debate threads, such as the skeptics thread. We do not go for only 1 type of fans or 1 "team" of fans. In fact we don't even use those terms. We have enough to do scanning everything we can for violations, because most of you gals are intelligent and know just how to keep it allowed. Thanks for the grey hairs! It's not like we're artificially bumping any thread in here - except me bumping my birthday thread. Which reminds me it's in due time soon... The only thing that keeps certain threads topped is because people feel the need to respond. Nothing is stopping you from making your own new topics about how Cas is better off at the bottom of the lake or in a loonybin or something entirely non Cas related! Make a post about crocs running wild in the Sydney Opera house! I assure you I have pages of stuff to say about that! The only interpretation we do, is when it comes to personal insulting, or if the arguments had suddenly revolves around the members and not the topic. In which case we ask to take it back on track before doing any form of modding. Like I state in the above post, having more freedom to post, also means you have more responsibility to keep the mudslinging off the boards. By the way I'm sorry to say I am not sure what you mean with insighting, is it infighting you mean? Otherwise the word escapes me. It wouldn't be the first time I learned a new word online! Aeryn certainly makes topics and one could come to the conclusion it's to get some form of reaction. You have made a few of your own by the way, this one included and they haven't been taken down either - even though they are targeting a member and not anything at all in regards to SPN or the actors involved. There is a difference between making controversial or emotional posts, and actual hate posts. If you think it started off great and now has gone downhill, that's no good. I would personally hate to see you post less. But we're all tiny little parts in the big Evicted machine. And I vividly encourage you to do your part in getting the boards back the way you liked them then! If it means humor, envolvement and more Bela pictures than one can fathom, you can be sure I'm getting on that bandwagon! As a member of the skeptic thread, I fail to see how a thread titled ( Cas skeptics are going to hell) is not an insult to me personnally. When i joined here and saw there was a skeptics thread I assumed I would be afforded the freedom to not be ridiculed by a fellow poster. Apparently I was wrong. The thread itself is an attack on posters who do not share Aeryn's point of view. You state in your post that you take issue with posters insulting other posters...yet you allow this to continue. First off. I'm a skeptic myself too, so there ya go. Secondly the actual title is "Cas haters are going to Hell" there is quite a way from being a skeptic to having actual hate for a fictional character. Be that as it may, a simple click and look inside would hopefully reveal it isn't someone trying to draw down Islam, Christianity or Satanism on anyone who hates Cas. To my knowledge these 3 religions are the only ones that take the concept of hell seriously (and Christianity, only just recently). Take into effect that this show is all about heaven, hell and most things inbetween deemed supernatural - and as far as we know hell is currently about standing in a long long line - as the OP states as well in the thread. I have taken a personal judgement call on that matter yes, like I said I and other mods do. I chose to take it in humor, as a mod and even more so as a Cas skeptic. |
|
purpledragon1229
Honorary Luthor
"The night is dark and full of terrors..."[C01:660066]
Posts: 1,272
|
Post by purpledragon1229 on Feb 12, 2012 23:31:02 GMT -5
Well it doesn't have to sticky. I don't mind one way or the other. Offer stands so long as SPN is on the air, just let me know. |
|
Mistermoonlight
Administrator
Crystal the Monkey Fan Club
"The dreamers ride against the men of action. Oh see the men of action falling back."--Leonard Cohen
Posts: 8,508
|
Post by Mistermoonlight on Feb 12, 2012 23:31:21 GMT -5
Who of the members have been banned? To my knowledge nobody. We've had to do 1 IP ban, after someone registered several accounts and clearly only wanted to make some trolling. That wasn't any active actual member. We give a lot of freedom to post whatever you wish. You can disagree to your hearts desire. In fact I would love it if you could show one instance where a mod has said or done anything against a post simply because it disagrees - not counting threads that specifically state they aren't made to be debate threads, such as the skeptics thread. We do not go for only 1 type of fans or 1 "team" of fans. In fact we don't even use those terms. We have enough to do scanning everything we can for violations, because most of you gals are intelligent and know just how to keep it allowed. Thanks for the grey hairs! It's not like we're artificially bumping any thread in here - except me bumping my birthday thread. Which reminds me it's in due time soon... The only thing that keeps certain threads topped is because people feel the need to respond. Nothing is stopping you from making your own new topics about how Cas is better off at the bottom of the lake or in a loonybin or something entirely non Cas related! Make a post about crocs running wild in the Sydney Opera house! I assure you I have pages of stuff to say about that! The only interpretation we do, is when it comes to personal insulting, or if the arguments had suddenly revolves around the members and not the topic. In which case we ask to take it back on track before doing any form of modding. Like I state in the above post, having more freedom to post, also means you have more responsibility to keep the mudslinging off the boards. By the way I'm sorry to say I am not sure what you mean with insighting, is it infighting you mean? Otherwise the word escapes me. It wouldn't be the first time I learned a new word online! Aeryn certainly makes topics and one could come to the conclusion it's to get some form of reaction. You have made a few of your own by the way, this one included and they haven't been taken down either - even though they are targeting a member and not anything at all in regards to SPN or the actors involved. There is a difference between making controversial or emotional posts, and actual hate posts. If you think it started off great and now has gone downhill, that's no good. I would personally hate to see you post less. But we're all tiny little parts in the big Evicted machine. And I vividly encourage you to do your part in getting the boards back the way you liked them then! If it means humor, envolvement and more Bela pictures than one can fathom, you can be sure I'm getting on that bandwagon! As a member of the skeptic thread, I fail to see how a thread titled ( Cas skeptics are going to hell) is not an insult to me personnally. When i joined here and saw there was a skeptics thread I assumed I would be afforded the freedom to not be ridiculed by a fellow poster. Apparently I was wrong. The thread itself is an attack on posters who do not share Aeryn's point of view. You state in your post that you take issue with posters insulting other posters...yet you allow this to continue. Maybe a Cas lovers are going to New Jersey thread? I mean, if you really want to scare them . . . |
|
Lostcause
Supernatural Fight Club
Don't be economic girlie men!
Posts: 1,273
|
Post by Lostcause on Feb 12, 2012 23:33:00 GMT -5
|
|
isitfridayyet
Supernatural Fight Club
I'd tear that ^^ shit up. Just sayin'![k4r][C01:009966]
Posts: 455
|
Post by isitfridayyet on Feb 12, 2012 23:39:03 GMT -5
As a member of the skeptic thread, I fail to see how a thread titled ( Cas skeptics are going to hell) is not an insult to me personnally. When i joined here and saw there was a skeptics thread I assumed I would be afforded the freedom to not be ridiculed by a fellow poster. Apparently I was wrong. The thread itself is an attack on posters who do not share Aeryn's point of view. You state in your post that you take issue with posters insulting other posters...yet you allow this to continue. Maybe a Cas lovers are going to New Jersey thread? I mean, if you really want to scare them . . .   |
|
|
|
Post by geordiegirl1967 on Feb 13, 2012 19:30:07 GMT -5
if the amulet is back...oooh! Now that would be one of the long lost details I never thoguht they'd "fix". Didn't they initially have him throw it out, partly because Jensen had it slamming up on his teeth during running and fight scenes? Ouch! : ![]() I would love to see the amulet back. Jensen has commented that it hit him in the face a couple of times, but that's not why they got rid of it. I think (hope) we will see it again. On the topic, I haven't been posting as much here lately because the personal animosity between certain individuals here has been infecting loads of threads. It is just childish and not enjoyable to have to wade through to find some actual discussion of the show. |
|
Rose
Supernatural Fight Club
Every rose has it's thorn[C01:ed143d][k4r]
Posts: 442
|
Post by Rose on Feb 13, 2012 19:58:34 GMT -5
The only reason why Jensen had the thing fly up and hit him in the face and hurt him is because he forgot to change to the rubber one they had made for him during fight scenes. So no, that most definitely isn't the reason why they got rid of it. They got rid of it to show the split of the brotherly bond and for another reason to hurt Sam, IMO.
|
|
ravanne
Supernatural Fight Club
[k4r]
Posts: 65
|
Post by ravanne on Feb 13, 2012 20:54:54 GMT -5
Then Dean must now wear the giant day-glo slinky that Sam got for him around his neck for the rest of his life. It's only fair.
|
|
isitfridayyet
Supernatural Fight Club
I'd tear that ^^ shit up. Just sayin'![k4r][C01:009966]
Posts: 455
|
Post by isitfridayyet on Feb 13, 2012 21:01:17 GMT -5
Welcome back, Ravanne.  |
|
Rose
Supernatural Fight Club
Every rose has it's thorn[C01:ed143d][k4r]
Posts: 442
|
Post by Rose on Feb 13, 2012 21:30:39 GMT -5
Then Dean must now wear the giant day-glo slinky that Sam got for him around his neck for the rest of his life. It's only fair. LMAO You said it, girl! And welcome back! You were missed! |
|
|
|
Post by benson35 on Feb 13, 2012 21:58:09 GMT -5
if the amulet is back...oooh! Now that would be one of the long lost details I never thoguht they'd "fix". Didn't they initially have him throw it out, partly because Jensen had it slamming up on his teeth during running and fight scenes? Ouch! : ![]() I would love to see the amulet back. Jensen has commented that it hit him in the face a couple of times, but that's not why they got rid of it. I hope we see that symbol of their brotherhood back soon. I don't care if we find it in Sams pocket when he has a lucifer episode or something. I'd love Dean to just find it on him and its just this touching scene. I can't believe we're still waiting for this necklace..lol |
|
Aeryn
Supernatural Fight Club
Posts: 6,545
|
Post by Aeryn on Feb 13, 2012 22:46:15 GMT -5
Welcome back, Ravanne. ![]() I was wondering where she was. Glad she's back.  |
|
isitfridayyet
Supernatural Fight Club
I'd tear that ^^ shit up. Just sayin'![k4r][C01:009966]
Posts: 455
|
Post by isitfridayyet on Feb 13, 2012 23:29:46 GMT -5
Dude...Sam HAS to have the amulet. I'd also like to know why we're still waiting to see it, just like we're STILL waiting to see WHY Dean's eyes BLED in Bloody Mary! |
|
Rose
Supernatural Fight Club
Every rose has it's thorn[C01:ed143d][k4r]
Posts: 442
|
Post by Rose on Feb 14, 2012 0:00:24 GMT -5
Dude...Sam HAS to have the amulet. I'd also like to know why we're still waiting to see it, just like we're STILL waiting to see WHY Dean's eyes BLED in Bloody Mary! ![]() I'm starting to think that neither of those things are ever going to come full circle.  |
|
Lostcause
Supernatural Fight Club
Don't be economic girlie men!
Posts: 1,273
|
Post by Lostcause on Feb 14, 2012 4:52:39 GMT -5
The only reason why Jensen had the thing fly up and hit him in the face and hurt him is because he forgot to change to the rubber one they had made for him during fight scenes. So no, that most definitely isn't the reason why they got rid of it. They got rid of it to show the split of the brotherly bond and for another reason to hurt Sam, IMO. I can't get myself to see how it would be to hurt Sam, from a writers POV I mean. I don't think they ever make deliberate choices to go above and beyond any literal (i.e we need to keep the plot machine rolling) reason to hurt either character, and the hurt from the necklace is too subtle to work that way for a big part of the viewers. |
|
